The members of an engineering team strive to find the best balance belligerently built product abilities and management of technology debt. The technical team hardens the procedure to define and handle this balance from time to time. The current procedures include virtual teaming that works from the feature development in hand to concentrate on the tech debt of a specific product segment. The basic strategy here is to assure that every product segment gets efficient maintenance effort allocation.
Velocity and Constant Improvement- Ying Yang Approach
If you think of basic business drivers in SaaS model, you wish to attract new clients on board with better specs while keeping the present subscriptions intact by constantly offering a solid solution. The hard work needs for it should be balanced across the company along with product development’s technical planning.
As for an agile startup which is constantly expanding the abilities and offering to meet the demand of the present market and to enter into new marker, there is a big possibility to maintain existing abilities. The obvious result with be a small and subtle enhancement in the tech debt which eventually demonstrates itself in the consumer experience and during the foundation when new specs are designed. Handling P1 and P2 problem isn’t tough- interject the work in progress and find a fix in the next release. However, if the issue undergoes internal testing or a single costumer opinion, it enters a tough pipeline.
One can also check this out from the other end. As tech developers love to hook down the loose ends. The development team has a pure desire to achieve perfection. Leaving loop holes and blemishes is not an option in technical world. Thus, maintaining a balance can extensively cause positive impact on the complete software production.
Throwing tomatoes over the fence isn’t an option
Companies hire a separate maintenance team which is half the size of a feature team. However, this isn’t the correct approach. It is just like one team designing new specs is throwing tomatoes over the fence for the other team to keep a check. .
As an after effect, it releases a loss in the ownership pride of the dev team of someone else handling the bugs. Without an effective interaction, the backstory states why a specific primary approach taken is lost. The basic knowledge isn’t there and thus the efficacy in managing the problem is diminished. And, the maintenance team of less skilled developers can hardly acknowledge the basic problem of the issue, leading to band-aid repair where rework will be required after sometime.
Catch up Sprints
In order to get rid of all the maintenance team issue, you need to hire catch-up sprints to move back from the new spec development and get a hold on debt. Usually it is important and it is great to get all eyes on the deck for specific themes. A catch-up session encompassed one or two themes like UX, performance or operations and the team worked intensively on them. Click here to find out how catch-up sprints work as a reliable solution to get timely and consistent service of tech debt.